8 Reasons Why Mutual Funds Make For Lousy Investments

Many people think that investing in mutual funds isIf a mutual fund makes money, both you and the
the way to go and the best method for gettingmutual fund company make money. But if a
rich. I think mutual funds are horrible investments.mutual fund loses money, you lose money and
Here are 8 reasons why you should not invest inthe mutual fund company still makes money.
mutual funds.What?? That's not fair!! Remember: the mutual
1. Mutual funds don't beat the market.fund company takes a bite out of your returns
72% of actively-managed large-cap mutual fundswith that 1.3% expense ratio. But it takes that
failed to beat the stock market over the pastbite whether you make money or lose money.
five years. Trying to beat the market is difficult,Think about that. The mutual fund company puts
and you're better off putting your money in anup 0% of the money to invest and assumes 0%
index fund. An index fund attempts to mirror aof the risk. You put up 100% of the money and
particular index (such as the S&P 500 index).assume 100% of the risk. The mutual fund
It mirrors that index as closely as it can by buyingcompany makes a guaranteed return (from the
each of that index's stocks in amounts equal tofees it charges). You, the investor, not only are
the proportions within the index itself. Fornot guaranteed a return, but you can lose a lot of
example, a fund that tracks the S&P 500money. And you have to pay the mutual fund
index buys each of the 500 stocks in that index incompany for those losses. (Remember also that,
amounts proportional to the S&P 500 index.even if you do make a return, over time the
Thus, because an index fund matches the stockmutual fund company takes about half of that
market (instead of trying to exceed it), itmoney from you.)
performs better than the average mutual fund6. Mutual Funds are unpredictable.
that attempts (and often fails) to beat theThe holdings of a mutual fund do not track the
market.stock market exactly. If the market goes up, you
2. Mutual funds have high expenses.might make a lot of money, or you might not. If
The stocks in a particular index are not athe market goes down (the way it is now), you
mystery. They are a known quantity. A companymight lose a little bit of money . . . or you might
that runs an index fund does not need to paylose A LOT. Because a mutual fund's benchmark
analysts to pick the stocks to be held in the fund.isn't a particular market index, its performance
This process results in a lower expense ratio forcan be rather unpredictable. Index funds, on the
index funds. Thus, if a mutual fund and an indexother hand, are more predictable because they
fund both post a 10% return for the next year,TRACK the market. Thus, if the market goes up
once you deduct The expense ratio for theor down, you know where your money is going
average large cap actively-managed mutual fundand how much you might make or lose. This
is 1.3% to 1.4% (and can be as high as 2.5%). Bytransparency gives you more peace of mind
contrast, the expense ratio of an index fund caninstead of holding your breath with a mutual fund.
be as low as 0.15% for large company indexes.7. Mutual Funds are sales items.
Index funds have smaller expenses than mutualWhy don't all these money and financial magazines
funds because it costs less to run an index fund.tell you about index funds? Why don't the covers
expenses (1.3% for the mutual fund and 0.15%of these magazines read "Index Funds: The Most
for the index fund), you are left with anObvious And Rational Investment!" It's simple.
after-expense return of 8.7% for the mutual fundThat's a boring heading. Who would want to buy
and 9.85% for the index fund. Over a period ofsomething that isn't exciting or that doesn't tickle
time (5 years, 10 years), that differenceone's imagination of immense riches? A magazine
translates into thousands of dollars in savings forwith that headline won't sell as many copies as a
the investor.magazine that boasts "Our 100 Best Mutual Funds
3. Mutual funds have high turnover.For 2008!" Remember: a magazine company is in
Turnover is a fund's selling and buying of stocks.the business of selling... magazines. It can't put a
When you sell stocks, you have to pay a tax onboring headline about index funds on its front
capital gains. This constant buying and sellingcover, even if that headline is true. They need to
produces a tax bill that someone has to pay.put something on the cover that will attract
Mutual funds don't write off this cost. Instead,buyers. Not surprisingly, a list of mutual funds that
they pass it off to you, the investor. There is noanalysts predict will skyrocket will sell loads of
escaping Uncle Sam. Contrast this problem withmagazines.
index funds, which have lower turnover. Because8. Warren Buffett does not recommend mutual
the stocks in a particular index are known, theyfunds.
are easy to identify. An index fund does not needIf the above seven reasons for not investing in
to buy and sell different stocks constantly; rather,mutual funds don't convince you, then why not
it holds its stocks for a longer period of time,listen to the wisdom of the richest investor in the
which results in lower turnover costs.world? In several annual letters to the
4. The longer you invest, the richer they get.shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway, Warren
According to a popular study by John Bogle (ofBuffett has commented on the value of index
The Vanguard Group), over a 15- or 16-yearfunds. Here are a few quotes from those letters:
period, an investor gets to keep only 47% of a1997 Letter: "Most investors, both institutional and
cumulative return from an averageindividual, will find that the best way to own
actively-managed mutual fund, but he or she getscommon stocks is through an index fund that
to keep 87% of the returns in an index fund. Thischarges minimal fees. Those following this path
is due to the higher fees associated with a mutualare sure to beat the net results (after fees and
fund. So, if you invest $10,000 in an index fund,expenses) delivered by the great majority of
that money would grow to $90,000 over thatinvestment professionals."
period of time. In an average mutual fund,2004 Letter: "American business has delivered
however, that figure would only be $49,000. Thatterrific results. It should therefore have been easy
is a 40% disadvantage by investing in a mutualfor investors to earn juicy returns: All they had to
fund. In dollars, that's $41,000 you lose by puttingdo was piggyback corporate America in a
your money in a mutual fund. Why do you thinkdiversified, low-expense way. An index fund that
these financial institutions tell you to invest for thethey never touched would have done the job.
"long term"? It means more money in theirInstead many investors have had experiences
pocket, not yours.ranging from mediocre to disastrous.
5. Mutual funds put all the risk on the investor.