Better ETF Investment Performance from Funds Based on Proprietary Index Methodologies?

v>year, the best performing of all these funds was
Investors are faced with dozens of exchangethe PowerShares large cap fund (PWB at
traded funds based on new, proprietary index+4.14%) followed by the Vanguard large growth
methodologies.  Growth funds outperformedfund (VUG at +3.08%).   One is based on an
value funds in 2007, but did funds based on new,active, proprietary index, the other on a traditional
proprietary methodologies outperform?  Theindex.Ironically, the worst performing of the funds,
results are mixed. Growth stocks outperformedover the same time frame, was also a
value in 2007.  Did the Exchange Traded Fundsproprietary index fund -- the PowerShares small
based on newer, proprietary index methodologiescap fund (PWT, -6.63%) while the best
produce better results for growth stock investorsperforming of the small cap growth funds was
during the volatile, last half of the year than theiralso proprietary -- Morningstar's JKK which came
traditional peers, Russell and MSCI Barra?Twoin at -0.94% for the last six months of the
providers of the new proprietary indexyear.The small cap growth funds based on the
methodologies are PowerShares and Morningstar. Russell and MSCI  indexes had very similar
Did their growth funds produce better results? performance to each other.  IWO's return was
Looking at four  large cap and four small cap-4.15% for the last six months, -7.68% from the
growth funds in both index categories, the resultshigh and +4.82% from the low and VBK's
are mixed.I've compared fund performance basedperformance was -4.29%, -7.50% and +4.63%
on three short time frames:  July 2 to year-endrespectively.For the last six months of the year,
(six months); October 9 (the market high) tolarge growth outperformed small growth, but the
year end; November 26 (the market low) tospread among the fund families was quite
year-end.The funds based on a proprietary indexwide:PWB outperformed PWT by 10.77%VUG
are, from PowerShares:PWT - PowerShares Smalloutperformed VBK by 7.37%IWF outperformed
Cap GrowthPWB - PowerShares Large CapIWO by 5.64%JKE outperformed JKK by
GrowthThese funds are based on the Dynamic3.39%Although all the funds are in negative
Intellidex index, which according to PowerSharesterritory from the market high of October 9, all
applies "a rigorous 10-factor style-isolation processthe large cap funds have continued to outperform
to objectively segregate companies into theirtheir small cap brethren on a relative return
appropriate investment style and size universe. basis.  But since the market low on November
Next, each company is thoroughly evaluated to26, something different has happened.PWB has
determine its investment merit by analyzingoutperformed PWT by only 1.68%VUG is dead
numerous unique financial characteristics from foureven with VBKIWF has underperformed IWO by
broad financial perspectives:  fundamental,1.36%JKE has underperformed JKK by
valuation, timeliness and risk."  That sounds an1.63%Since large cap funds typically outperform
awfully lot like an actively managed fund.Fromat the end of a bull market, the six month returns
iShares, based on Morningstar indexaren't unexpected.  But the short-term
methodology:JKK - Morningstar Small Capperformance, since the market low on November
GrowthJKE - Morningstar Large Cap26, seems out of character.  Could it possibly
GrowthMorningstar is less descriptive.  Theirmean that the market has already discounted the
funds are managed by Barclays Global Fundcoming recession, and that small growth
Advisors (iShares.com) and the fund literaturecompanies are poised to move ahead?   Or is it
simply states that stocks are selected based onsimply a sign of just how oversold the small caps
"above-average 'growth' characteristics aswere and how speculative market participants
determined by Morningstar's proprietary indexhave become at this stage of the game?One
methodology."   Still, "above average" wouldmeasure of speculative enthusiasm is the relative
seem to imply that some companies that mightstrength of the Nasdaq Composite index
be included in an index based solely on market(COMPQ), covering more than 3,000 companies,
capitalization and broadly defined growthcompared to the Nasdaq 100 (NDX), the 100
characteristics would be left out.  And thatlargest companies in the composite.  Looking at
should, theoretically, improve returns.Thethe two indexes over the same three short-term
traditional index ETFs based on indexes fromtime periods we see similar results, indicating that
established index providers are:From Russellfrom November 26 to year end, investors were
Investments, which has provided indexwilling to speculate:NDX outperformed COMPQ by
methodologies for over 25 years:IWO - Russell5.93% over the last six monthsNDX
2000 Growth (small companies)IWF - Russell 1000outperformed COMPQ by 1.44% from the
Growth ( large companies - also sold throughmarket highNDX was only 42 basis points ahead
iShares)From MSCI Barra, which calculates overof COMPQ from the market low.Return
100,000 equity, REIT and hedge fund indexescalculations courtesy of   Returns are net of
daily:VBK - Vanguard Small Cap GrowthVUG -fees and exclude re-invested dividends.
Vanguard GrowthFor the last six months of the