Buy Bonds for Safety? More Investment Myths Exposed

For many investors, there are only two assetsnear record high levels (interest rates near record
worth considering most of the time - stocks orlow levels). So what should you be doing - buying
bonds. "When the stock market falters, switch toor selling? I told you it was simple.
bonds for 'safety.' They might be dull and boring,The last time I recommended buying bonds was
compared to the roller-coaster ride shares canin 1989, when the yield on the Australian 10-year
give you, but you can't lose on US Governmentwas 14%. It has since been below 5% and is still
Bonds, because apart from less volatility, youbelow 6%.
have the strongest guarantee in the world." SoToday if you buy 30-year US bonds, you are
goes the argument.locking in less then 5% per annum for 30 years.
Is this true? Are Uncle Sam's Treasuries safe?In 1981 you could have locked in 15% per annum.
Well, if you don't mind lending your hard-earnedAnd you could have sold them along the way for
savings to someone who already owes $9 trilliona huge capital profit. Yet today they are infinitely
and has no chance of ever paying it back, I guessmore popular than they were in 1981, when
you could say they are safe.bonds were a dirty word. That's human nature.
Bonds are only safe because people (including"The 13 ¼ percent bond due in 2014 that
international investors, even central banks) thinkthe government sold on May 15, 1984, returned
they are safe. When it comes time for Uncle Saman annualized 24 percent. The S&P 500
to repay his loans, he simply borrows some morereturned 13 percent, including dividends, during the
(issues new bonds), often from the same people.same period." Courtesy Bloomberg
The lemmings love them. If that's not a giganticClearly the most important thing is not so much
Ponzi scheme, what is? If you or I tried it, we'dwhat you buy and sell but when you buy and sell.
be behind bars! But the scheme survives becauseThe junk bond market is a disaster waiting to
people believe in it, as they do the fractionalhappen. With investors desperate to get a better
reserve banking system..yield, they have been prepared to ignore risk,
Just like money in the bank, technically bonds arewith the result that the spread between
a very unsafe investment. But whilst ever thegovernment paper and junk is near a record low.
public maintains confidence in the confidence trickInvestors are clamoring for junk yet it is clearly
that both represent, you should not lose toothe worst possible time to be doing so. Along with
much.private equity and hedge funds, associated junk
But this brings up the main factor to considerbonds are going to be the greatest disaster since
when buying bonds. Creditworthiness is one thing.the dotcom crash (unless the housing crunch
But the market risk is of even greater concern.beats it to the punch).
And whatever I have to say about TreasuriesBut with countries like China and Japan owning
here is doubled, tripled, quadrupled and more whenhundreds of billions of dollars worth of US
it comes to junk bonds (lower than investmentGovernment paper, is there no risk that panic
grade).selling could break out at any time even in the
Investing is so easy. You only have to remember"quality" market, causing a collapse in bond prices
one rule: Buy when prices are low; Sell whenand a corresponding escalation in long term
prices are high. It's that simple. Yet it is humaninterest rates around the world? A persistent
nature to do the opposite. When an asset hasinverse yield curve has been warning of trouble
been on the bottom for years, nobody wants toahead for many months. Does the fact that this
touch it. Once it has doubled in price, everybodyhas been ignored mean that the trouble will not
wants to buy it. Crazy, huh? But that's why aoccur?
study of crowd behavior (socionomics and ElliottThe expression "flight to safety," when used in
Wave patterns) is far more important than areference to bonds, may really mean "out of the
study of economic fundamentals.frying pan into the fire.
So, where are bonds now? Like stocks, they are