Ishares and ETFs: Indexed Investment Illusions

How many of you remember the immortal wordsBut let's not dwell upon the three or more levels
of P. T. Barnum? Of Yogi Berra? On Wall Street,of speculation that are the very foundation of all
the incubation period for new product scams mayindex funds. Let's move on to the two basic ideas
be measured in years instead of minutes, but thethat led to the development of plain vanilla Mutual
end result is always a lopsided, greed-driven, goldFunds in the first place: diversification and
rush toward financial disaster. The melt downprofessional management. Mutual Funds were a
spawned the index mutual funds, and their dismalmonumental breakthrough that changed the
failure gave life to "enhanced" index funds, a wideInvestment World. Hands on investing (without
variety of speculative hedge funds, and finally, athe self-centered assistance of the banks and
rapidly growing number of Index ETFs. Deja Vu allinsurance companies) became possible for
over again, with the popular ishare variety of ETFabsolutely everyone. Self directed retirement
leading the lemmings to the cliffs. How far will weprograms and cheap to administer employee
allow Wall Street to move us away from thebenefit programs became doable. The investment
basic building blocks of investing? What evermarkets, once the domain of an elite group of
happened to stocks and bonds? The Investmentwealthy entrepreneurs, became the savings
Gods are not happy.accounts of choice for the employed masses. But
A market or sector index is a statisticalonly because the Funds were relatively safe with
measuring device that tracks the movement oftheir guarantees of diversification and professional
price changes in a portfolio of securities that aremanagement! ETFs are just not the answer to
selected to represent a portion of the overallthe problems we've experienced lately with
market. Index ETF creators: a) select a samplingtraditional Mutual Funds. (Those problems are a
of the market that they expect to befunction of Fund Manager Compensation, conflicts
representative of the whole, b) purchase theof interest within Fund Sponsor Organizations, the
securities, and then c) issue the ishares, SPDRS,delivery and pricing system for the funds, and
CUBEs, etc. that you can trade on the normalbelieve it or don't, the self directed retirement
exchanges just like ordinary stocks. Unlikeprograms themselves.)
ordinary index funds, ETF shares are not handledHere's a thumbnail sketch of how well the major
directly by the fund, and as a result, they canPassively Managed Indices have done since the
move either up or down from the value of theturn of the century: For those six years, the DJIA
securities in the fund, which, in turn, may or maygrowth rate averaged Zero % per year, the S &
not mirror the movements of the index theyP 500 averaged Minus 2% per year, and the
were selected to track. Confused? There's more...NASDAQ Composite averaged Minus 8% per
these things are designed for manipulation!year! How many positive sectors, technologies,
Unlike managed Closed-End Funds (CEFs), ETFcommodities, or capitalization categories could
shares can be created or redeemed by marketthere have been? Go ahead, add in 1999 just to
specialists, and Institutional Investors can redeemmake yourself feel better and you'll come up with
50,000 share lots (in kind) if there is a gap+2% per year for the DJIA, Zero % annually for
between the net-asset-value and the marketthe S & P, and a stellar -1.5% per year for the
price of the fund. These activities create demandNASDAQ. Now subtract the fees... hmmmm.
in order to minimize the gap between the fundAgain, how would those ishares have fared? Hey,
net-asset-value and the fund price. Clearly, thesewhen you buy cheap and easy, it's usually worth
arbitrage activities provide profit-makingit. Now if you want performance, I suggest you
opportunities to the fund sponsors that are nottry management. Any management is better than
available to the shareholders. Perhaps that is whyno management, so long as you are receptive to
the fund expenses are so low... and why therethe strategies or disciplines employed by the
are now hundreds of the things to choose from.manager. If you can't understand or accept the
Two other ishare/ETF idiosyncrasies need to bestrategy, don't hire the manager. During the past
appreciated: a) performance return statistics forsix years, there have been more advancing issues
index funds typically do not include fundthan declining ones on the NYSE, more stocks
expenses... it should be fairly obvious that an indexachieving new highs than new lows. Why did you
fund will always under-perform its market, and b)lose money?
some index funds, ishares in particular, publish P/ESure, you might find some smiles in an ishare or
numbers that only include the profitable companiestwo, particularly if you have the courage to take
in the portfolio. How do you feel about that?your profits, and there may be times when it
So, in addition to the normal risks associated withmakes good business sense to use these
investing in general, we add: speculating inproducts as a hedge against a specific risk. But
narrowly focused sectors, guessing on theplease, stop kidding yourself every time Wall
prospects of unproven small cap companies,Street comes up with a new short cut to
experimenting with securities in single countries,investment success. Don't underestimate the
rolling the dice on commodities, and hoping for thevalue of experienced management, even if you
eventual success of new technologies. We thenhave to pay a little extra for it. Actually, there is
call this hodge-podge of speculations a diversified,no reason why you (and I mean every one of
passively managed, inexpensive approach to 21styou) can't learn either to run your own
Century Asset Management! How this differsinvestment portfolio, or to instruct someone how
from how the mess started is a mystery to me.you want it done. Every guess, every estimate,
Once upon a time, there were high yield junkevery hedge, and every shortcut increases risk,
bond funds that the financial community insistedbecause none of the crystal balls used by those
were appropriate investments because of theircreative product hucksters works very well over
excellent diversification. Does diversified junkthe long haul. Products and gimmicks are never
become un-junk? Isn't "Passive Management" asthe answer. ETFs, a combination of the two, don't
much of an oxymoron as "Variable Annuity"?even address the question properly. What's in
What ever happened to the KISS Principle?your portfolio?