Low Cost Index Funds - Finding The Lowest Cost S&P 500 Index Mutual Funds

For a better mutual fund and ETF investmentindex mutual funds directly from other fund
strategy, focus on very low cost, broad market,families at just a .1% annual management fee
passive index mutual funds and ETFs. They costwith no sales charges? Well, there really is no
less and get the broad market return -- whatevervalue-added. None. Zip. Nada. If you are naive
that will be -- before costs. They narrow theenough to pay higher investment costs for an
range of investment portfolio outcomes, andindex funds, then these ridiculously high fees are
therefore they reduce the risk to your long-termjust a wealth transfer from you to the industry
personal financial plan. They take far less time tothat repeatedly bleeds your personal investment
manage personally. Furthermore, extensiveportfolio year after year.
financial research has shown clearly andSo, how can you find low cost S&P 500
overwhelmingly that a passive, low cost indexindex mutual funds? There are a couple ways.
strategy for individual investors tends to beFirst, you could read these 18 fund screening
superior from a risk-adjusted, after-tax, and netarticles by The Skilled Investor: "Selecting
returns standpoint.Investment Funds -- Mutual Funds and ETFs" The
Unfortunately, lately, the index fund investmentSkilled Investor also suggests using the and the
space has become a minefield for individualautomated on-line fund screeners to screen funds,
investors. Given the growing popularity of indexbecause they are free to use, and they have
fund investing, many new supposed "index"relatively current and comprehensive mutual fund
mutual fund and ETF products have beenand ETF databases. There are articles that tell
introduced to the market that may notyou how to use these fund screeners.
necessarily serve the interests of passive,Get educated and get smart about selecting
buy-and-hold individual investors. Some of themutual funds and ETFs. Picking them just because
index investment land mines out there are highthey have 4 star and 5 star ratings and a nice
index fund costs, active "index" management, andhistorical performance graph usually leads to lousy,
new indexing definitions and concepts that straysub-par results. Historical performance is just
from the original asset-weighted concept that hasindustry marketing bait for naive, performance
served individual investors so well for severalchasing investors, who will most often arrive at
decades.the party too late.
Measured by invested assets, the S&P 500Second, you can read this research article,
index is the most common index fund benchmark"S&P 500 Index Mutual Funds," by John A.
in the U.S. The S&P 500 tracks about 75%Haslem, H. Kent Baker, and David M. Smith
of publicly traded U.S. equity market asset value.published in the March/April 2007 Journal of
You might think that you can pick any oldIndexes (pages 34-38). Haslem, Baker, and Smith
S&P500 benchmarked index fund or ETF andanalyzed the investment expenses of
thereby adopt a passive, low cost, broad marketS&P500 index mutual funds and found a
index strategy. Nope, sorry. Life just neververy wide dispersion of management fees and
seems to be that easy.total expense ratios.
The dominant issue with S & P 500 indexWithout all their research details, which you can
mutual funds and ETF funds is that fees chargedread yourself, Haslem, et.al. simply found that
by securities industry firms are all over the maphigher expenses just lowered investors' net
from reasonably low to shockingly high. If you arereturns. They grouped S & P 500 index
not careful, there is even one S & P 500funds by expense groupings from low to high, i.e.
index fund out there that will charge you 2.71%standard deviations around the average expense
annually for management fees and 12b-1ratio. They reported a list of twenty-five retail
investment sales fees combined.and institutional index mutual funds with lower
You might ask, what is the value added for suchcosts.
high fees, when you can purchase S&P 500