Low Cost Index Funds -- Finding The Lowest Cost S&p 500 Index Mutual Funds

etter mutual fund and ETF investment strategy,high fees, when you can purchase S&P 500 index
focus on very low cost, broad market, passivemutual funds directly from other fund families at
index mutual funds and ETFs. They cost less andjust a .1% annual management fee with no sales
get the broad market return -- whatever that willcharges? Well, there really is no value-added. None.
be -- before costs. They narrow the range ofZip. Nada. If you are naive enough to pay higher
investment portfolio outcomes, and thereforeinvestment costs for an index funds, then these
they reduce the risk to your long-term personalridiculously high fees are just a wealth transfer
financial plan. They take far less time to managefrom you to the industry that repeatedly bleeds
personally. Furthermore, extensive financialyour personal investment portfolio year after
research has shown clearly and overwhelminglyyear.
that a passive, low cost index strategy forSo, how can you find low cost S&P 500 index
individual investors tends to be superior from amutual funds? There are a couple ways. First, you
risk-adjusted, after-tax, and net returnscould read fund screening articles by The Skilled
standpoint.Investor: "Selecting Investment Funds -- Mutual
Unfortunately, lately, the index fund investmentFunds and ETFs." The Skilled Investor also
space has become a minefield for individualsuggests using the and the automated on-line fund
investors. Given the growing popularity of indexscreeners to screen funds, because they are free
fund investing, many new supposed "index"to use, and they have relatively current and
mutual fund and ETF products have beencomprehensive mutual fund and ETF databases. I
introduced to the market that may nothave written articles that tell you how to use
necessarily serve the interests of passive,these fund screeners.
buy-and-hold individual investors. Some of theGet educated and get smart about selecting
index investment land mines out there are highmutual funds and ETFs. Picking them just because
index fund costs, active "index" management, andthey have 4 star and 5 star ratings and a nice
new indexing definitions and concepts that strayhistorical performance graph usually leads to lousy,
from the original asset-weighted concept that hassub-par results. Historical performance is just
served individual investors so well for severalindustry marketing bait for naive, performance
decades.chasing investors, who will most often arrive at
Measured by invested assets, the S&P 500 indexthe party too late.
is the most common index fund benchmark in theSecond, you can read this research article, "S&P
U.S. The S&P 500 tracks about 75% of publicly500 Index Mutual Funds," by John A. Haslem, H.
traded U.S. equity market asset value. You mightKent Baker, and David M. Smith published in the
think that you can pick any old S&P500March/April 2007 Journal of Indexes (pages
benchmarked index fund or ETF and thereby34-38). Haslem, Baker, and Smith analyzed the
adopt a passive, low cost, broad market indexinvestment expenses of S&P500 index mutual
strategy. Nope, sorry. Life just never seems tofunds and found a very wide dispersion of
be that easy.management fees and total expense ratios.
The dominant issue with S & P 500 index mutualWithout all their research details, which you can
funds and ETF funds is that fees charged byread yourself, Haslem, et.al. simply found that
securities industry firms are all over the maphigher expenses just lowered investors' net
from reasonably low to shockingly high. If you arereturns. They grouped S & P 500 index funds by
not careful, there is even one S & P 500 indexexpense groupings from low to high, i.e. standard
fund out there that will charge you 2.71% annuallydeviations around the average expense ratio.
for management fees and 12b-1 investment salesThey reported a list of twenty-five retail and
fees combined.institutional index mutual funds with lower costs.
You might ask, what is the value added for such