What's Wrong With Mutual Funds?

Why are Most Mutual Funds Bad Investments?couple years you will have to pay the capital gains
Most actively traded mutual funds are poortaxes on these gains, even if the fund is flat and
products from the investor's point of view. Thisyou never make a dime. Those embedded gains
may come as a surprise to many people sincewere actually experienced by the prior owners of
mutual funds are the primary investment productthe fund (not you). Most people do not realize this
for most individual investors and they are veryfact about mutual funds.
heavily advertised. Professional institutional5. You can't predict which funds will be the best
investors rarely use active mutual funds. Thereperformers and "beat the market" ahead of time.
are a number of problems with most activeAccording to numerous statistical studies, past
mutual funds such as:performance is not an indicator of future
1. They have high costs. The average activeperformance. Funds which have the hottest
equity mutual fund has an expense ratio of overrecent records are not likely to continue to
1%. In addition to this, there are trading costsprovide the best returns, contrary to popular
that may subtract as much as .5% fromopinion. Funds which have good performance
performance each year. I'm not even countinggather assets at a rapid rate, making it much
"sales loads" on some funds of 5% or moremore difficult for the portfolio manager to
which I hope you aren't paying. How high are thecontinue to perform well. In addition, funds with
expenses on your mutual funds? I hope not 1%strong recent records are often just lucky to
or more. These expenses can eat up 25%-40%have been in the hottest part of the market or
of your total returns and can end up costing youthe "in" style. Buying last year's winners is usually
a fortune over 10-20 years (due to compounding).a poor strategy which often results in buying
2. Most mutual funds underperform the market.future laggard funds. You may recall how most of
This is primarily due to their high expensesthe risky technology/internet funds had the best
mentioned in point #1 above. According to Lipper,recent track records and the highest Morningstar
Inc. over the past 20 years the average USratings at the peak of the stock market bubble.
stock fund lagged the market by about 2% perThey subsequently provided horrible losses to
year. The true track record is actually noticeablyinvestors.
worse than this due to "survivorship bias".6. The Portfolio Managers keep changing, and they
Survivorship bias occurs when poorly performingare too short-term oriented. Portfolio manager
funds are closed or merged (with betterturnover (on each mutual fund) averages about
performing funds) and are not counted in thisevery 5 years now. So even if you fund a fund
data. The actual data including all funds (includingand a manager you like with a good track record,
the closed/merged funds) is probably anotherchances are the same portfolio manager will not
percentage point worse than the numberbe there for long.
mentioned above. Over 10 years or longer it is7. Portfolio Managers often drift from the
typical that 75% (or more) of all active mutualstrategy they are supposed to be following. They
funds lag the market. The mutual fund firmstend to drift towards whatever has been working
promote their recent "winner" funds so much thatlately (by adding more mid-size companies or
you would think all funds beat the market (whichinternational stocks to a large-company portfolio)
of course is impossible).to try to add to performance. The problem with
3. They are tax-inefficient. Most active mutualthis is you don't really know what you are getting
funds have fairly high turnover (aroundwhen you invest in the fund. You think you have
40%-100% per year on average), causinga large company domestic growth fund when in
short-term and long-term gains which are taxablereality a significant percentage of the fund may
each year. This causes some of the return (thebe invested in other sectors or countries.
short-term gains) to be taxed at very high8. Mutual fund companies are at least as
ordinary income tax rates. It also prevents theconcerned about marketing and making money
power of compound returns from providingfor themselves as they are about investment
maximum power by constantly taking gains andperformance for shareholders.
paying taxes each year. When you own mutualSo if active mutual funds are often poor
funds, you do not control the timing of takingproducts, what is an investor to do? I
capital gains (or not taking them).recommend and invest in ETF's (Exchange Traded
4. You may inherit capital gains and owe taxes onFunds). These are similar to low-cost index funds,
gains you never actually experienced. Does thatbut they trade like stocks. ETF's are one of the
seem fair? If you buy most active funds after afastest growing investment products and have
big upward move in the market, you will inheritbeen used by professional investors (like myself)
the gains in the stocks in the fund. Over the nextfor many years.