Reasons To Fire Your Mutual Fund Company: Soft Dollar Expenses

#10 - Soft Dollar ExpensesThe reason a mutualjunior analyst or two, in exchange for the fund's
fund exists is so small investors can pool theirorder flow at, say, 5 cents a share versus the
money, hire professional management, and attainnormal 2 cents a share. The sell-side brokers get
diversity that would be nearly impossible for thefat commissions, the fund manager gets "stuff"
small investor by himself or herself. It would standthat would otherwise be paid out of his
to reason then that funds with hundreds ofmanagement fee. Everybody is happy...except for
millions, or even billions, would have economies ofthe shareholders who are footing the bill, and for
scale to demand from the street the mostthe most part, have no idea, that this is going on
competitive rates for trading their shares. Yet, asunless they read deep into the prospectus' fine
you will see, not only are fund firms NOT gettingprint.Why You Should CareThe Wall Street Journal
the most competitive rates, they are paying wellinvestigated this practice and determined that, in
more than any individual can get through their2002, $12 billion dollars were spent in soft dollar
discount broker.What are Soft Dollararrangements, where $6.7 billion of this was an
Expenses?Hard dollars are expenses that comeunnecessary mark-up from the sell side. Further,
out of a fund manager's management fee. TheseWSJ spotlighted several firms that were paying 5
expenses include salaries for the fund managers,cents per share traded. That's $50 per 1,000
analysts, and customer service people (yep, youshares. Now, consider that any individual can open
get dinged when you call that 800 line), the costsan account with a discount broker and pay less
of printing all those statements and other requiredthan $10 for a comparable execution. The
literature, and all other office expenses associatedwholesale rate for clearing these trades is
with running a fund. Oddly, very real expensesprobably $1 for diligently-shopped execution
such as spreads and trading commissions are notservices performed on an agency basis for a
included in the hard dollar tally, and show up onlymulti-billion dollar fund.The Investment Company
as a slightly decreased, barely perceptibleInstitute (the apologist association of Mutual Fund
decrease in annual performance. High friction inManagement Firms) brushes off this practice by
these areas can amount to substantial costs overstating that all of the items received have value
the course of a year when you consider that athat the shareholders would have to pay anyway.
multi-billion dollar mutual fund trades billions andMaybe. But, these expenses should be coming out
billions of shares.Recognizing that decreasing aof the management fee. This practice masks
dollar of hard expenses for a fund managerhidden expenses that can be used by individuals
increases profit to their bottom line by a dollar, selland their advisers when comparing one fund
side firms make arrangents with the fundversus another. The only reason to mask the
managers to provide everyday items in exchangetrue expenses is to hide the fact that the
for order flow at above-market costs. Formanagers are siphoning off more money from
example, a sell side brokerage firm providesinvestors than their fiduciary duty allows. In less
investment research (the value of which is itself insavory professions, this arrangement is called a
doubt), Bloomberg terminals, office space, even akickback.